Bush Free-Speech Forum
 

Censorship news around the globe

www.bannedmagazine.com, the journal of censorship and secrecy

state by state censorship news

Home About Books Contact Email updates Film Free-speech Links Internet Censorship Opinion Protest Poetry

Australia China Cuba Lebanon Malaysia New Zealand Thailand United Kingdom United States Country links; Australia through U.S.
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington state Washington, D.C. West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Links for each state
 
Copyright Banned Magazine

Bong Hits For Jesus sign that got Joseph Frederick in trouble

Joseph Frederick was the only

student suspended for holding this

sign at Olympic torch rally in 2002

because he refused to let go when

his principal grabbed it.

(Photo courtesy ACLU)

“Bong Hits 4 Jesus” Pits

Ken Starr vs the ACLU,

Oral Arguments Monday

For Student Speech Case

(Read the updated story)

 

Joseph Frederick in China where he teaches English

Joseph

Frederick

By Joshua B. Good

Thursday, March 15, 2007

 

    Joseph Frederick was an Alaskan rebel in high school. On a cold morning in January of 2002, the then 18-year-old senior prepared for the 2002 Olympic torch relay through Juneau that was to pass in front of his high school by unfurling a large banner.

      It read “Bong Hits 4 Jesus.”

      He said he hoped his sign would get on TV. Instead,

 Frederick’s principal, Deborah Morse, tore the 14-foot sign from the hands of Frederick and the other students who waved the banner.

      The principal suspended Frederick from school for 10 days.

      And now, the “Bong Hits 4 Jesus” case will be heard before the U.S. Supreme Court today (March 19, 2007). It is being called the most important high school free speech case since the court’s famous Tinker vs Des Moines ruling in 1969 that established the idea that students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.”

      Frederick maintains he was off campus, an adult and wasn’t advocating smoking pot. The Juneau School District argues the Olympic torch parade was a school field trip and Frederick was being disruptive by advocating illegal drug use.

      The 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals sided with Frederick.

      Frederick, now 23, teaches English to students in China, a country not well known for tolerating free speech. Frederick won’t be in Washington, D.C., for the oral arguments by his American Civil Liberties Union lawyers and Kenneth Starr, who is representing the school district. Starr led the investigation into former President Bill Clinton over Whitewater, the death of Vince Foster and Clinton's affair with intern Monica Lewinsky.

      Mary Beth Tinker plans to attend the Supreme Court hearing, according to the ACLU. She was the one who refused to remove a black armband protesting the Vietnam War while a high school student in Des Moines.

      Tinker’s protest was significant and timely. Frederick admits he wasn’t advocating for legalizing drugs or smoking pot. He just wanted to get on TV.     

      But Justin Goldberg says that doesn’t matter. Goldberg edits the quarterly journal for the National Coalition Against Censorship.

“If the court rules that the principal did have the right to suppress Frederick's speech off campus ... then it creates the potential for schools to interfere more broadly with student speech, such as off-campus theater productions, or even what students put on their Myspace pages or blogs,” Goldberg said.

 

    "This case presents the Court with a much-needed opportunity to resolve a sharp conflict among federal courts … over whether the First Amendment permits regulation of student speech when such speech is advocating or making light of illegal substances." Kenneth Starr’s brief to U.S. Supreme Court.

 

    “This case raises fundamental First Amendment issues about the ability of school officials to censor speech solely because that speech disagrees with the school’s own, preferred message.” ACLU Legal Director Steven R. Shapiro’s brief to U.S. Supreme Court.

 

(Read the updated story)

 

 (ACLU's web page on "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" case)

 

Post Comments About This Story.

Search

post comments