Politics and buy weapons?
Ok, I want to beat a dead horse here, but the other day I had a REALLY bad experiance with representatives Ruger suppliers to the Foundation Conference Rocky Mountain Elk. Ruger has a reputation of being more anti-gun. Bill Ruger good ol 'supported the assault weapons ban 1996, with support from a number of laws on firearms californistan absurd. Ruger has been a leading manufacturer to provide past AR-style semi-automatic rifles, and was killed after the Bill Ruger. They still do not have the capacity magazines Hello! for most models. I agree that usually make good products, but not so good (* big) gun on the market, why should the hard earned money go to a company with a history not to support the rights of their clients? All thoughts appreciated, as always.
They should not. the same reason, stopped buying Levis is the same reason, left buy Ruger. They are anti-gun supporters! I loved my Ruger assault weapons ban. "I stopped buying Ruger and changed to other providers, has opened a vast world imports. I even got rid of my collection a couple of Ruger pistols. The only people who did not get rid of my summer 10/22 and 22/45 Mark II. However, after the draft died Ruger, Ruger and reverse policies prohibit over. … I started looking at new (and buy) its products. Excluding my originals have more than tripled Ruger my collection. We in his eyes as consumers, need to ban together, write letters and boycott. Track companies across the page website of the NRA and the ILA local grassroots organizations in my area. http://www.nraila.org/issues/factsheets/read.aspx?id=15 http://www.scopeny.org/antigun.html http://gunowners.org/fs0302.htm http://snarkyhuntress.blogspot.com/2009/08/anti-gun-corporationscorporate-heads.html and HTTP, including: / / www.pinkpistols.org / antigun.html
Arkansas’s highpoint – Mount Magazine
Tags: flickr, magazine mountain ar, magazine mountain arkansas, photo, photography, photos, sharing